CAN Sues FG Over CAMA Act, Demand To Be Excluded

CAN Sues FG Over CAMA Act, Demand To Be Excluded
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
Telegram
LinkedIn
Print

Nigeria’s Apex religious association the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) has dragged the federal government to court over the recently gazetted Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020 (CAMA).

The move, obviously was to submit the Association’s displeasure over some provisions of the Act which the Christian body has mounted opposition against.

The move was disclosed to newsmen by CAN’s General Secretary Joseph Daramola who said in a statement that the leadership of the Association resolved to approach the court after all attempts to convince the federal government not to intervene or interfere with the management of the Church directly or indirectly failed.

Read Also: CAMA: Buhari Planning A Coup Against Christianity – Cleric

Daramola explained that the suit between the Incorporated Trustees of CAN and Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) and the Minister of Industry, Trade, and Investment was filed before the Federal High Court, Abuja, and the case was mentioned on Monday.

Plaintiff counsel was led by Joe-Kyari Gadzama, SAN. Others in the legal team include Prof J Amupitan, SAN; Wale Adesokan, SAN; Isaac Okpanachi, Esq; Comfort Otera Chigbue, Esq; Godswill Iyoke, Esq; Dr. Cyril Obika, Esq.

Others are Geraldine Mbah, Esq; Francis Oronsaye, Esq; Oluniyi Adediji, Esq; Charles Ndukwe, Esq; Emmanuel Ekong, Esq; and Darlington Onyekwere, Esq; Madu Joe-Kyari Gadzama, Esq; Lama Joe-Kyari Gadzama, Esq; Rev Fr. Joseph Ilorah, Esq; Jerry Onbugadu Musa, Esq; Amazing Ikpala, Esq; and a host of other legal luminaries.

At the mentioned of the case at the Federal High Court, Abuja, on Monday, CAN leaders, notably, the General Secretary, Joseph Bade Daramola, Esq; Elder Kunle Fagbemi, Senator Philip Gyunka, Elder Tunde Adegbesan, Rev Dr. Testimony Onifade, the Director, Legal and Public Affairs, Comfort Otera Chigbue, Esq; and Senator Jonathan Zwingina, were conspicuously present.

CAN, last year, contested some sections of CAMA which empowered the CAC to suspend church trustees and appoint interim managers who could be non-Christian. CAN described the Act as poorly drafted and illegal, indicating sloppiness, illogicality, and malice.

Many other interested parties also vowed to challenge the CAMA Act 2020, on the grounds that it’s reprehensible and illegal for the CAC to be both the prosecutor and the judge.

Under the new CAMA Act, CAC can replace church trustees if they ‘reasonably’ believe there has been mismanagement, misconduct, or fraud to protect its property in the public interest. Under CAMA 2020, a non-Christian may be appointed interim manager of a Church to replace Christian church members, and there is no tenure limit for the appointed interim management.

 

AFRICA DAILY NEWS, NEW YORK

WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
Telegram
LinkedIn
Print