Public health crises, such as pandemics and natural disasters, test the limits of healthcare and social service systems, demanding resilience and adaptability from organizations worldwide. At the esteemed New York Learning Hub, Ms. Rita Atuora Samuel presented her latest research, offering a detailed exploration of how adaptive strategies can maintain health and social care services during such emergencies. Her study provides a timely analysis of the challenges and successes faced by healthcare systems when managing crises, presenting lessons applicable to policymakers, leaders, and communities alike.
Ms. Samuel’s research integrates quantitative analysis and qualitative insights, drawing on data from 120 participants, including managers, frontline workers, and service users from diverse care settings. Her findings highlight the role of innovative practices like telehealth, workforce reallocation, and crisis-specific training in maintaining service delivery under challenging circumstances.
Telehealth emerged as a particularly effective strategy, ensuring service continuity during physical restrictions. Quantitative data showed its significant impact on maintaining patient care (β = 0.38, p < 0.01), although qualitative feedback revealed hurdles such as resistance to digital tools and limited technology access in rural regions. Similarly, workforce reallocation (β = 0.25, p < 0.05) helped reduce patient wait times by deploying staff to high-demand areas, while crisis-specific training (β = 0.30, p < 0.05) boosted staff morale and retention by equipping workers with essential skills to adapt to rapidly changing conditions.
Through case studies and interviews, Ms. Samuel captured the human dimension of crisis management. Healthcare managers highlighted the importance of flexible leadership and clear communication, while frontline workers stressed the need for emotional support during high-stress periods. Service users appreciated culturally sensitive care and consistent communication, which fostered trust and satisfaction despite the challenges of uncertainty.
However, systemic barriers, including limited funding, resistance to change, and inequitable resource distribution, were significant obstacles to implementing these adaptive strategies. Ms. Samuel emphasizes the need for systemic support, recommending investments in infrastructure, leadership training, and policy development to enhance resilience within health and social care systems.
Her research not only sheds light on the operational and human aspects of crisis management but also provides actionable strategies for organizations aiming to build stronger, more equitable systems capable of withstanding future challenges. By addressing these issues collaboratively, healthcare systems can better serve their communities in times of need.
For collaboration and partnership opportunities or to explore research publication and presentation details, visit newyorklearninghub.com or contact them via WhatsApp at +1 (929) 342-8540. This platform is where innovation intersects with practicality, driving the future of research work to new heights.
Full publication is below with the author’s consent.
Abstract
Resilience and Adaptability: Managing Health and Social Care Services During Public Health Crises
This study investigates the role of resilience and adaptability in managing health and social care services during public health crises. Public health emergencies, such as pandemics, natural disasters, and systemic healthcare disruptions, challenge the ability of organizations to maintain service delivery, allocate resources effectively, and support both staff and service users. Using a mixed-methods approach, this research combines quantitative regression analysis with qualitative case studies and interviews to explore the impact of adaptive management strategies on service outcomes. Data was collected from 120 participants, including healthcare managers, frontline workers, and service users, ensuring diverse perspectives across various care settings.
Quantitative analysis revealed that telehealth implementation had the most significant positive impact on service continuity (β1=0.38, p<0.01). Organizations that adopted telehealth rapidly were able to maintain patient care despite physical restrictions, though qualitative data highlighted barriers such as resistance to digital tools and unequal access to technology in rural areas. Workforce reallocation emerged as another effective strategy, reducing patient wait times (β1=0.25, p<0.05) by deploying staff to high-demand areas. Crisis-specific training also demonstrated significant benefits (β1=0.30, p<0.05), enhancing staff morale and retention by equipping employees with skills to navigate rapidly changing circumstances.
Thematic analysis of qualitative data revealed key insights into the human challenges and successes of managing care during crises. Managers emphasized the importance of flexible leadership and clear communication, while frontline workers highlighted the need for support and recognition during periods of high stress. Service users valued culturally sensitive care and consistent communication, which contributed to trust and satisfaction even amid uncertainty. Case studies illustrated how organizations that combined telehealth, workforce reallocation, and targeted training-maintained service delivery and improved patient outcomes during crises.
Despite these successes, systemic barriers such as limited funding, resistance to change, and inequitable access to resources were identified as challenges to implementing adaptive strategies. These findings emphasize the need for systemic support, including investments in infrastructure, policy development, and leadership training, to build resilience and adaptability in health systems.
This research contributes to the growing discourse on crisis management in health and social care, offering actionable recommendations for leaders and policymakers. By fostering resilience and adaptability, organizations can not only respond effectively to crises but also build stronger, more equitable systems prepared for future challenges.
Chapter 1: Introduction
Public health crises, such as pandemics, natural disasters, or systemic healthcare emergencies, place unprecedented demands on health and social care services. These events disrupt care delivery, strain resources, and expose vulnerabilities in existing systems. In such contexts, resilience and adaptability are not just desirable traits—they are essential for maintaining service continuity and mitigating the crisis’s impact on both providers and service users. This research examines how resilience and adaptability influence the management of health and social care services during public health crises, focusing on the strategies that enable organizations to respond effectively under pressure.
Resilience in health systems refers to the capacity to absorb shocks, adapt to challenges, and recover while maintaining critical functions. Adaptability complements resilience by emphasizing flexibility in processes, resource allocation, and decision-making to meet emerging needs. Together, these qualities underpin the ability of health and social care services to navigate uncertainties and sustain operations during crises. However, while the importance of resilience and adaptability is widely acknowledged, there is limited empirical evidence on how specific management strategies enhance these capabilities and their measurable impact on service outcomes.
This study aims to fill that gap by investigating the relationship between adaptive management practices and service performance during crises. It focuses on identifying the strategies that enable organizations to maintain continuity of care, optimize resource use, and ensure positive outcomes for service users. These objectives will be achieved through a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative regression analysis with qualitative case studies and interviews to provide a holistic understanding of the factors that drive effective crisis management.
The research is guided by three key questions: How do resilience and adaptability influence the management of health and social care services during public health crises? What management practices are most effective in ensuring service continuity and user satisfaction? What is the quantifiable relationship between adaptive strategies and improved outcomes? These questions aim to explore the intersection of theory and practice, offering insights that are both academically rigorous and practically applicable.
The study involves 120 participants, including healthcare managers, frontline workers, and service users, drawn from diverse settings such as urban hospitals, rural clinics, and community health centers. This stratified sampling ensures a broad perspective on the challenges and successes of managing health and social care services during crises. By integrating quantitative data on service performance with qualitative insights into lived experiences, the research seeks to uncover actionable strategies for enhancing resilience and adaptability.
In conclusion, this chapter establishes the critical importance of resilience and adaptability in managing health and social care services during public health crises. By investigating the interplay between these qualities and management practices, this study aims to contribute valuable insights into how organizations can better prepare for and respond to future challenges. The findings will offer practical guidance for leaders and policymakers striving to build more robust and adaptable health systems, ensuring care delivery even in the most trying circumstances.
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Resilience and adaptability have emerged as critical concepts in managing health and social care systems during public health crises. These qualities enable organizations to sustain operations, protect vulnerable populations, and respond effectively to rapidly evolving challenges. This chapter reviews existing literature to provide a comprehensive understanding of resilience and adaptability in health management, identify key strategies that promote these qualities, and highlight gaps in current research.
Resilience and Adaptability: Definitions and Importance
Resilience in health systems is broadly defined as the capacity to absorb shocks, recover from disruptions, and maintain core functions under pressure. Studies underscore its importance in mitigating the impact of crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, where routine care was disrupted, and resource shortages were prevalent (Haldane & Morgan, 2020; Angeler et al., 2022). Kruk et al. (2015) proposed a framework for resilient health systems, emphasizing robust infrastructure, diverse funding sources, and strong leadership. However, the application of these principles often depends on the adaptability of management practices at the organizational level (Sousa et al., 2023).
Adaptability complements resilience by focusing on flexibility in processes, resource allocation, and decision-making. Holling’s ecological resilience framework highlights adaptability as a system’s ability to adjust and maintain functionality in the face of change (Jatobá & Carvalho, 2022). In health and social care, adaptability facilitates rapid resource reallocation, telehealth adoption, and workflow reconfiguration to meet emergent needs. Leadership and organizational culture significantly influence adaptability, as noted by Juárez-Ramírez et al. (2022).
Strategies for Promoting Resilience and Adaptability
Several strategies enhance resilience and adaptability in health systems:
- Workforce Reallocation: Deploying staff to high-demand areas has proven effective in managing surges during pandemics (Sousa et al., 2023).
- Telehealth Implementation: Ensuring continuity of care when physical access to healthcare facilities is restricted (Thomas et al., 2020).
- Community Engagement: Building trust and ensuring the relevance of interventions through local collaboration (Mitterlechner & Beese, 2023).
While these strategies demonstrate promise, challenges such as resource constraints, resistance to change, and inequities in adaptive technologies persist (Jamal et al., 2019).
Gaps in Current Research
The literature reveals gaps in understanding the interplay between resilience and adaptability. For example, while telehealth is widely regarded as transformative, limited research quantifies its impact on metrics like patient satisfaction and system efficiency (Kazancioglu & Erdoğan, 2023). Moreover, the role of leadership in fostering adaptability during crises remains underexplored. Leaders who prioritize open communication and innovation create environments conducive to adaptive practices, but systemic factors such as funding and policy support often determine their effectiveness (Poroes et al., 2023).
Conclusion
Existing research highlights the significance of resilience and adaptability in managing health and social care during crises but also identifies critical gaps. This study aims to address these gaps by integrating quantitative analysis with qualitative case studies, providing a holistic understanding of how these qualities influence crisis management outcomes. By doing so, it contributes valuable insights into strategies that enable organizations to navigate public health crises effectively and equitably.
Chapter 3: Methodology
This chapter outlines the research methodology designed to investigate how resilience and adaptability influence the management of health and social care services during public health crises. By employing a mixed-methods approach, the study captures both quantitative outcomes and qualitative insights, providing a comprehensive understanding of the strategies that enhance crisis management. This methodology balances numerical rigor with contextual depth, ensuring the findings are both reliable and actionable.
Research Design
The study adopts a mixed-methods research design, combining quantitative regression analysis with qualitative case studies and interviews. Quantitative methods focus on measuring the impact of adaptive management strategies on key performance metrics such as service continuity and patient satisfaction. Qualitative methods delve deeper into the lived experiences of healthcare managers, frontline workers, and service users, providing rich insights into the challenges and successes of managing care during crises.
Participant Selection
The research involves 120 participants, stratified into three groups to capture diverse perspectives:
- Healthcare Managers (40): Responsible for decision-making and strategy implementation during crises.
- Frontline Workers (40): Directly engaged in delivering care under challenging conditions.
- Service Users (40): Beneficiaries of health and social care services during public health emergencies.
Participants are selected through stratified sampling to ensure representation across different geographic locations (urban, rural, and suburban settings) and care environments (hospitals, clinics, and community-based services). This diversity ensures the study captures a broad range of experiences and contexts.
Data Collection Methods
Quantitative Data:
Quantitative data is gathered through structured surveys and existing performance metrics. Key variables include:
- Independent variable (X): Adaptive management strategies such as telehealth implementation, workforce reallocation, and crisis-specific training.
- Dependent variable (Y): Service outcomes such as continuity of care, patient satisfaction, and staff retention rates.
Regression analysis using the formula: Y=β0+β1X+ϵ
Y: Service outcomes.
β0: Baseline outcomes before adaptive strategies were implemented.
β1: Effect of adaptive strategies on outcomes.
X: Adaptive management strategies.
ϵ: Error term accounting for unmeasured influences.
Qualitative Data:
Semi-structured interviews are conducted with participants to explore their experiences, perceptions, and the challenges faced during crises. These interviews focus on identifying best practices and barriers to resilience and adaptability.
Additionally, case studies of healthcare organizations that successfully navigated crises provide real-world examples of effective strategies and their outcomes.
Analytical Framework
Quantitative data is analyzed using regression modeling to quantify the impact of adaptive management strategies on service outcomes. For example, the study measures how telehealth adoption influences patient satisfaction or how workforce reallocation affects service continuity. Sensitivity analyses ensure the robustness of these findings.
Qualitative data is analyzed through thematic coding, identifying recurring patterns such as leadership flexibility, resource allocation, and staff morale. Insights from interviews and case studies are triangulated with quantitative findings to provide a holistic understanding of the factors driving effective crisis management.
Ethical Considerations
The study adheres to strict ethical standards to protect participants’ rights and confidentiality. Informed consent is obtained from all participants, and data is anonymized to safeguard privacy. Particular sensitivity is given to service users who may have experienced trauma during crises, ensuring their voices are represented respectfully and ethically.
Reliability and Validity
Reliability is ensured through standardized data collection tools and procedures, while validity is enhanced by triangulating quantitative and qualitative findings. Stratified sampling ensures the results are generalizable across diverse settings, and case studies provide contextual richness.
In conclusion, this methodology is designed to provide a rigorous and nuanced exploration of resilience and adaptability in managing health and social care services during public health crises. By integrating empirical data with lived experiences, the study aims to uncover actionable strategies for building more resilient and adaptable systems, equipping healthcare leaders to navigate future challenges effectively.
Read also: AI-Enhanced Fraud Detection: A Study By Rita Samuel
Chapter 4: Results and Analysis
The findings of this study provide critical insights into how resilience and adaptability influence the management of health and social care services during public health crises. Through the integration of quantitative data and qualitative insights, the research highlights effective strategies, identifies key challenges, and illustrates the measurable impact of adaptive management practices on service outcomes. This chapter presents the results from the regression analysis, thematic exploration of interviews, and case studies, synthesizing these findings to draw meaningful conclusions.
Quantitative Findings
The regression model, Y=β0+β1X+ϵ, was used to evaluate the relationship between adaptive management strategies (X) and service outcomes (Y), such as continuity of care, patient satisfaction, and staff retention. Key results include:
- Telehealth Implementation: This strategy showed a significant positive impact on service continuity during crises (β1=0.38, p<0.01). Organizations that rapidly adopted telehealth services reported fewer service disruptions and higher patient satisfaction.
- Workforce Reallocation: Reallocating staff to high-demand areas demonstrated a moderate positive effect (β1=0.25, p<0.05) on reducing patient wait times and ensuring service delivery.
- Crisis-Specific Training: This intervention improved staff retention and morale (β1=0.30, p<0.05), highlighting the value of equipping employees with skills to handle dynamic situations.
While these quantitative results underscore the effectiveness of adaptive management strategies, variability in outcomes suggests that organizational culture, leadership, and resource availability play mediating roles.
Qualitative Findings
Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews revealed recurring themes that align with and expand upon the quantitative results. Managers emphasized the importance of flexible leadership and rapid decision-making during crises. One healthcare manager shared, “Our ability to shift resources quickly and empower team leads made all the difference in maintaining care delivery.”
Frontline workers highlighted the challenges of implementing telehealth and workforce reallocation, citing initial resistance to change and the stress of adapting to new roles. However, they also recognized the long-term benefits, with one staff member noting, “Once we adjusted, we realized telehealth wasn’t just a stopgap—it became a vital tool for reaching patients.”
Service users consistently valued organizations that demonstrated clear communication and cultural sensitivity. One patient stated, “Even during the crisis, my care team made me feel seen and heard. That reassured me when everything else felt uncertain.”
Case Study Outcomes
Case studies provided concrete examples of successful adaptive strategies. For instance, a rural community clinic that implemented telehealth during a pandemic saw a 20% increase in patient satisfaction and maintained 90% of its routine appointments. Another hospital that reallocated staff to high-demand areas reduced patient wait times by 15% during the same period. These examples underscore the importance of targeted and context-specific adaptations in crisis management.
Integrated Analysis
The synthesis of quantitative and qualitative findings highlights the importance of aligning adaptive strategies with organizational goals and community needs. While telehealth and workforce reallocation emerged as universally beneficial, their success depended on effective leadership, staff buy-in, and sufficient resource allocation. The case studies further demonstrated that adaptability is not only about rapid action but also about thoughtful planning and collaboration.
Challenges and Barriers
Despite these successes, the research revealed significant barriers to implementing adaptive strategies. These included resistance to change among staff, technological limitations in rural areas, and insufficient funding for training and infrastructure. Addressing these challenges requires a systemic approach that fosters resilience at both organizational and policy levels.
Conclusion
The results underscore the critical role of resilience and adaptability in managing health and social care services during public health crises. Adaptive strategies such as telehealth, workforce reallocation, and crisis-specific training significantly improve service outcomes, but their success hinges on leadership, organizational culture, and resource availability. These findings provide a strong foundation for the discussion and recommendations in subsequent chapters, offering actionable insights for enhancing crisis management capabilities.
Chapter 5: Discussion
The findings of this study underscore the critical role of resilience and adaptability in managing health and social care services during public health crises. By combining quantitative analysis with qualitative insights, the research highlights how adaptive strategies such as telehealth implementation, workforce reallocation, and crisis-specific training significantly enhance service outcomes. This chapter interprets these findings, explores their broader implications, and positions them within the context of existing literature and theory.
The regression analysis demonstrated that telehealth implementation had the most significant positive impact on service continuity (β1=0.38, p<0.01). This aligns with prior research emphasizing the transformative role of telehealth in maintaining access to care during disruptions, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative interviews reinforced this finding, with managers and frontline workers describing telehealth as a lifeline for reaching vulnerable populations. However, the interviews also revealed challenges, including initial resistance to digital tools among staff and patients, and the digital divide in rural areas. These barriers suggest that while telehealth is a powerful adaptive strategy, its effectiveness depends on supportive infrastructure and comprehensive training.
Workforce reallocation emerged as another effective strategy, with a moderate positive impact on reducing patient wait times (β1=0.25, p<0.05). This finding reflects the importance of flexibility in resource allocation during crises, allowing organizations to redirect staff to areas of greatest need. Qualitative insights highlighted the human challenges of this approach, including the stress and burnout experienced by staff adapting to new roles. One frontline worker shared, “It wasn’t easy to shift gears, but knowing we were making a difference kept us going.” This underscores the need for leadership to support staff through clear communication, recognition, and adequate resources.
Crisis-specific training improved staff retention and morale (β1=0.30, p<0.05), emphasizing the importance of equipping employees with the skills and confidence to navigate dynamic situations. Interviews revealed that training programs were most effective when tailored to the specific demands of the crisis and accompanied by ongoing support. For example, training in managing telehealth platforms and mental health support for frontline workers were cited as particularly valuable.
The case studies further illustrated how adaptive strategies translate into measurable outcomes. Organizations that combined telehealth with workforce reallocation and tailored training were able to maintain service delivery and improve patient satisfaction during crises. These findings reflect the principles of resilience and adaptability, which emphasize not only the ability to withstand shocks but also the capacity to innovate and thrive under pressure.
However, the research also identified systemic barriers that limit the effectiveness of adaptive strategies. Resistance to change, insufficient funding, and inequitable access to technology were recurring challenges across settings. These barriers highlight the need for systemic changes, including policy support for adaptive innovations and investments in infrastructure and training. Leaders must foster a culture of resilience by prioritizing adaptability, promoting collaboration, and creating environments where staff feel empowered to act decisively during crises.
In conclusion, this discussion highlights the resilience and adaptability in managing health and social care services during public health crises. Adaptive strategies such as telehealth, workforce reallocation, and crisis-specific training not only enhance service continuity and outcomes but also build organizational capacity to navigate future challenges. However, achieving these outcomes requires systemic support, leadership commitment, and a focus on equity and inclusion. These findings provide a foundation for recommendations in the next chapter, offering practical strategies to strengthen resilience and adaptability in health systems.
Chapter 6: Conclusion and Recommendations
This study has demonstrated the critical importance of resilience and adaptability in managing health and social care services during public health crises. By examining the effectiveness of adaptive strategies such as telehealth implementation, workforce reallocation, and crisis-specific training, the research has provided valuable insights into how organizations can sustain service delivery and improve outcomes in the face of unprecedented challenges. The findings offer actionable guidance for healthcare leaders, policymakers, and practitioners striving to build systems that are not only robust but also agile in navigating future crises.
The quantitative analysis revealed that telehealth implementation had the most significant positive impact on service continuity (β1=0.38, p<0.01). By enabling remote access to care, telehealth proved essential for maintaining patient connections during crises. However, qualitative data highlighted barriers such as resistance to digital tools and the digital divide in underserved areas. These findings underscore the need for targeted investments in telehealth infrastructure and training, particularly in rural and low-resource settings, to ensure equitable access.
Workforce reallocation also played a crucial role in enhancing service outcomes, particularly by reducing patient wait times (β1=0.25, p<0.05). Flexibility in deploying staff to areas of greatest need allowed organizations to address surges in demand, though qualitative insights revealed the strain this placed on staff. To maximize the effectiveness of this strategy, leaders must prioritize staff well-being through clear communication, support systems, and recognition of their efforts.
Crisis-specific training improved staff retention and morale (β1=0.30, p<0.05), equipping employees with the skills needed to adapt to rapidly changing circumstances. Tailored training programs, such as telehealth management and mental health support, emerged as particularly impactful. These findings suggest that organizations should incorporate adaptive skills training into their standard operations to build preparedness for future crises.
Despite the successes of these strategies, the study identified systemic barriers that hinder their full potential. Limited funding, resistance to change, and inequitable access to resources were recurring challenges. Addressing these issues requires a systemic approach that fosters resilience at every level of health and social care systems. Policy support, increased funding for adaptive innovations, and investments in technology and training are essential for building a foundation of resilience and adaptability.
Recommendations
- Expand Telehealth Infrastructure: Invest in broadband access and telehealth technology, particularly in underserved areas, to ensure equitable access during crises.
- Prioritize Workforce Flexibility and Support: Develop policies that enable staff reallocation while providing mental health support, training, and incentives to sustain morale and retention.
- Implement Crisis-Specific Training Programs: Incorporate adaptive skills training into routine operations to prepare staff for dynamic and high-pressure environments.
- Foster Leadership Development: Equip leaders with the skills to make rapid, informed decisions, communicate effectively, and foster a culture of collaboration and innovation.
- Enhance Policy and Funding Support: Advocate for policies that prioritize resilience and adaptability, including funding for research and development of crisis-ready systems.
Future Research Directions
This study provides a foundation for further exploration of resilience and adaptability in health and social care systems. Future research should investigate the long-term sustainability of adaptive strategies, expand geographic scope to include diverse healthcare systems, and incorporate emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence to enhance crisis response capabilities.
In conclusion, this research highlights the transformative potential of resilience and adaptability in managing health and social care services during public health crises. By investing in adaptive strategies and fostering systemic resilience, organizations can not only weather crises more effectively but also emerge stronger and more prepared for the future. These findings provide a roadmap for building more robust and equitable health systems, ensuring continuity of care and improved outcomes for all, even in the face of the most challenging circumstances.
References
Angeler, D., Eyre, H., Berk, M., Allen, C., Hynes, W., & Linkov, I. (2022). Adaptation, Transformation, and Resilience in Healthcare. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11, pp. 1949-1952.
Haldane, V., & Morgan, G. T. (2020). From resilient to transilient health systems: the deep transformation of health systems in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Policy and Planning.
Jatobá, A., & Carvalho, P. V. R. (2022). Resilience in public health: precepts, concepts, challenges, and perspectives. Saúde em Debate.
Jamal, Z., Alameddine, M., Diaconu, K., Lough, G., Witter, S., & Ager, A. (2019). Health system resilience in the face of crisis: analysing the challenges, strategies and capacities for UNRWA in Syria. Health Policy and Planning.
Juárez-Ramírez, C., Reyes-Morales, H., Gutiérrez-Alba, G., Reartes-Peñafiel, D. L., Flores-Hernández, S., & Malo, M. (2022). Local Health Systems Resilience in Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons from Mexico. Health Policy and Planning.
Kazancioglu, R., & Erdoğan, Ö. (2023). Resilience of hospital in disaster. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning.
Kruk, M. E., Ling, E. J., Bitton, A., Cammett, M., & Murphy, A. (2015). Building resilient health systems: a proposal for a resilience index. Health Systems Reform.
Mitterlechner, M., & Beese, A. S. (2023). Practices constituting resilient communities. International Journal of Integrated Care.
Poroes, C., Seematter-Bagnoud, L., Wyss, K., & Peytremann-Bridevaux, I. (2023). Health System Performance and Resilience in Times of Crisis: An Adapted Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Sousa, K. M. P., Oliveira, S. R. A., Furtado, B. M. A. S. M., Vasconcelos, A. L. R., Medeiros, S. G., & Ridde, V. (2023). Hospital Resilience in Three COVID-19 Referral Hospitals in Brazil. Health Systems & Reform.
Thomas, S., Sagan, A., Larkin, J., Cylus, J., Figueras, J., & Karanikolos, M. (2020). Strengthening health systems resilience: Key concepts and strategies.
