Access to equitable healthcare remains a pressing issue worldwide, with marginalized communities often bearing the brunt of systemic disparities. At the prestigious New York Learning Hub, Ms. Rita Atuora Samuel presented her insightful research on health equity in management practices, a timely study that emphasizes on practical strategies to bridge these gaps. Her work sheds light on actionable interventions that can make healthcare more inclusive, particularly for underserved populations.
Ms. Samuel’s research integrates quantitative data analysis with qualitative perspectives, offering a comprehensive understanding of how healthcare organizations can adopt equity-focused management practices. Drawing from a diverse sample of 120 participants across varied healthcare settings, her study examines interventions such as cultural competency training, resource reallocation, and community outreach programs. These strategies, as her findings reveal, hold the potential to significantly improve access to and the quality of healthcare services for disadvantaged communities.
One of the key highlights of the study is the impact of cultural competency training, which emerged as a powerful tool for improving patient satisfaction and communication, particularly with marginalized populations. Quantitative analysis revealed a strong positive effect (β = 0.42, p < 0.01), showcasing its ability to foster empathy and understanding between healthcare providers and patients. Similarly, reallocating resources to underserved areas showed moderate success (β = 0.28, p < 0.05), reducing wait times and expanding access for low-income groups. Community outreach programs (β = 0.31, p < 0.01) further enhanced trust and engagement through initiatives like mobile clinics and bilingual services.
Beyond the numbers, qualitative insights from interviews and case studies provide valuable context. Patients shared experiences of feeling respected and understood under culturally informed care practices, while healthcare workers emphasized the importance of aligning organizational priorities with equity-driven goals. However, challenges such as funding limitations and resistance to change were noted, highlighting the complexity of implementing such reforms.
Ms. Samuel’s work offers clear recommendations for healthcare organizations: invest in comprehensive cultural competency training, use data-driven approaches to allocate resources, and design tailored community engagement programs. Leadership commitment and robust data systems are emphasized as critical to sustaining these efforts.
This research is not only a vital contribution to the discourse on health equity but also a call to action for policymakers, healthcare leaders, and communities to work collaboratively toward a fairer healthcare system.
For collaboration and partnership opportunities or to explore research publication and presentation details, visit newyorklearninghub.com or contact them via WhatsApp at +1 (929) 342-8540. This platform is where innovation intersects with practicality, driving the future of research work to new heights.
Full publication is below with the author’s consent.
Abstract
Health Equity in Management Practices: Strategies for Reducing Disparities in Access and Outcomes
This study investigates the impact of equity-focused management practices on reducing disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates quantitative regression analysis and qualitative insights from case studies and interviews to explore the effectiveness of interventions such as cultural competency training, resource reallocation, and community outreach programs. With data collected from 120 participants across diverse healthcare settings, the study provides a comprehensive understanding of how targeted strategies can promote health equity.
Quantitative findings reveal that cultural competency training has the strongest positive impact (β1=0.42, p<0.01), significantly improving patient satisfaction and communication with marginalized populations. Resource reallocation to underserved areas (β1=0.28, p<0.05) showed moderate success in reducing wait times and improving access for low-income patients, while community outreach programs (β1=0.31, p<0.01) enhanced trust and engagement through initiatives such as mobile clinics and bilingual services. The results underscore the critical role of management interventions in addressing systemic inequities.
Qualitative insights from interviews and case studies provide context to these statistical findings. Participants emphasized the importance of empathy, cultural sensitivity, and strategic resource deployment in fostering equitable care. For example, patients reported feeling more valued and understood under culturally informed care practices, while staff highlighted the challenges of implementing equity-driven initiatives, particularly in resource-limited settings. These insights reveal the importance of aligning organizational culture with equity goals to overcome barriers such as resistance to change and funding constraints.
The study concludes that effective management practices are essential for advancing health equity. Recommendations include comprehensive cultural competency training, data-driven resource allocation, and tailored community engagement initiatives. Leadership commitment and robust data systems are critical for sustaining these efforts. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on health equity, providing actionable strategies for healthcare organizations to reduce disparities and improve outcomes for underserved populations. Future studies should explore the long-term sustainability of these interventions and incorporate emerging technologies to further enhance equity-driven practices.
Chapter 1: Introduction
Health equity, the principle of ensuring fair and just access to healthcare regardless of socioeconomic, racial, or geographic differences, remains a persistent challenge in the global healthcare system. While the concept has gained significant attention in recent years, disparities in access and outcomes continue to disproportionately affect marginalized populations. From longer wait times and limited availability of resources in underserved areas to stark differences in patient outcomes based on race or income, inequities in healthcare are pervasive. This research aims to address these disparities by examining the role of management practices in fostering health equity and identifying strategies to reduce disparities in access and outcomes.
Healthcare management is a critical lever in the pursuit of health equity. Effective management practices can bridge gaps in care by optimizing resource allocation, improving patient-centered approaches, and fostering inclusive environments. Yet, while the potential of management interventions is well recognized, there remains a lack of empirical evidence quantifying their direct impact on reducing disparities. This study seeks to fill that gap by integrating quantitative analysis and qualitative insights to evaluate how management strategies influence health equity metrics.
The objectives of this research are threefold. First, it aims to identify the management practices most effective in promoting health equity. Second, it seeks to quantify the relationship between these practices and measurable improvements in access and outcomes, focusing on equity metrics such as patient satisfaction, wait times, and health outcomes across demographic groups. Finally, the study endeavors to provide actionable recommendations for healthcare leaders, ensuring that the findings can be applied in real-world settings to drive meaningful change.
To achieve these objectives, the research poses several key questions: What specific management practices are most effective in addressing disparities in access and outcomes? How do these practices impact the experiences and perceptions of patients and staff? And what is the mathematical relationship between management interventions and equity improvements? By addressing these questions, this study will offer a comprehensive understanding of how healthcare organizations can actively promote equity through strategic management.
The scope of this research includes 120 participants drawn from diverse healthcare settings, including urban, rural, and underserved areas. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating statistical regression analysis with thematic insights from case studies and interviews. This methodology ensures a balanced examination of numerical trends and human experiences, capturing the complex interplay between management practices and health equity. While the study acknowledges potential limitations, such as the challenge of isolating variables and the focus on a specific geographic region, its design ensures robust and reliable findings.
In conclusion, this chapter establishes the importance of addressing health disparities through effective management practices. By combining quantitative rigor with qualitative depth, this research aims to provide actionable strategies for healthcare leaders, contributing to a more equitable healthcare system and improving outcomes for underserved populations. The findings will offer a roadmap for organizations striving to make equity a central tenet of their operations, addressing one of the most pressing challenges in modern healthcare.
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Health equity remains a focal point in public health discourse, with persistent disparities in access and outcomes across socioeconomic, racial, and geographic groups. Despite various initiatives, progress in addressing these inequities remains slow, particularly in underserved populations. This chapter reviews existing literature to explore the role of management practices in fostering health equity, identify gaps in knowledge, and contextualize this study within broader healthcare research.
Conceptual Foundations of Health Equity
The concept of health equity is intricately linked to the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH), encompassing factors such as income, education, geographic location, and social environment. These determinants influence health outcomes significantly, with research showing that disparities in these areas lead to unequal access and health outcomes (Hooper & Pérez-Stable, 2023). For instance, systemic inequities in healthcare access and quality are often shaped by structural and institutional barriers, disproportionately affecting marginalized populations (Dentzer, 2022).
The Role of Healthcare Management Practices
Healthcare management practices, including resource allocation, staff training, and patient-centered care strategies, are critical for addressing health disparities. Patient-centered care, emphasizing empathy and cultural competence, has demonstrated potential in bridging gaps in healthcare access and outcomes (Khetpal et al., 2021). For example, culturally competent training programs have been shown to improve patient satisfaction and reduce language-based barriers to care (Okolo et al., 2024).
However, the scalability of such interventions remains a challenge, highlighting the need for system-wide management practices. Research indicates that equity-focused leadership and inclusive policies are necessary for driving sustainable change (Schwartz, 2024). Leadership that prioritizes community engagement and allocates resources to underserved areas can significantly reduce disparities in healthcare access and outcomes (Alhusamiah, 2024).
Gaps in Existing Research
Despite the promise of targeted management interventions, gaps in the literature persist. Much research focuses on individual-level interventions, such as improving provider-patient communication, while broader organizational strategies addressing systemic inequities remain underexplored (Macintosh et al., 2022). Furthermore, there is limited empirical research quantifying the impact of specific management practices on health equity metrics, such as reduced wait times and improved patient satisfaction (Key et al., 2023).
Additionally, the mechanisms through which organizational culture and diversity initiatives improve health equity outcomes are poorly understood. Studies suggest a strong correlation between workforce diversity and patient satisfaction, particularly among minority groups (Woodward et al., 2020). However, the pathways linking these initiatives to measurable equity improvements require further investigation.
Emerging Trends and Opportunities
Recent studies emphasize the importance of integrating health equity into broader healthcare strategies. For example, the use of data analytics and health informatics has shown promise in identifying and addressing disparities (Veinot et al., 2019). Moreover, equity-focused quality improvement frameworks, which incorporate SDOH and cultural factors, provide actionable insights for enhancing healthcare delivery (Royeen, 2023).
Efforts to address health inequities must also include structural interventions that tackle the root causes of disparities. For instance, addressing systemic racism and implicit bias through targeted training programs has been effective in fostering inclusive healthcare environments (Avant & Gillespie, 2019). These approaches highlight the need for comprehensive, multi-level strategies to achieve health equity.
Conclusion
The literature highlights the critical role of healthcare management in promoting health equity. While individual-level interventions have shown promise, broader organizational and systemic approaches are necessary to address persistent disparities. By integrating quantitative and qualitative methods, this study aims to bridge the gap between theory and practice, offering actionable insights for healthcare leaders and organizations striving to make equitable care a reality.
Chapter 3: Methodology
This chapter outlines the research design and methodology employed to evaluate the impact of management practices on health equity. By integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches, the study seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of how specific interventions influence disparities in access and outcomes. The mixed-methods approach ensures a balance between numerical rigor and contextual depth, making the findings both reliable and actionable.
Research Design
The study adopts a mixed-methods research design, combining statistical analysis with in-depth qualitative case studies. This approach allows for the exploration of measurable trends while also capturing the lived experiences of healthcare managers, staff, and patients. Quantitative methods provide a foundation for identifying correlations and patterns, while qualitative insights add nuance and context, enabling a deeper understanding of how management practices translate to health equity improvements.
Participant Selection
The study involves 120 participants, stratified into three key groups: healthcare managers (40), frontline staff (40), and patients (40). Participants are drawn from diverse healthcare settings, including urban hospitals, rural clinics, and community health centers. This diversity ensures that the data captures a wide range of experiences and challenges, reflecting the complexities of promoting health equity across different contexts. Stratified sampling is employed to ensure representation across demographic and organizational variables, such as geographic location, patient demographics, and resource availability.
Data Collection Methods
Quantitative data is collected using structured surveys and existing equity metrics, such as patient wait times, satisfaction scores, and health outcomes disaggregated by demographic factors. These metrics serve as dependent variables in the study’s statistical analysis. Managers and staff also complete surveys assessing their use of equity-focused management practices, such as resource allocation strategies, patient-centered care initiatives, and workforce diversity programs.
Qualitative data is gathered through semi-structured interviews and case studies. Interviews with managers, staff, and patients provide insights into perceptions of health equity, challenges faced, and the effectiveness of implemented strategies. Four case studies focus on healthcare organizations that have adopted equity-focused interventions, offering real-world examples of success and failure.
Analytical Framework
Quantitative analysis employs a regression model, represented by the equation:
Y=β0+β1X+ϵ
Where:
Y: Health equity outcomes (e.g., reduction in disparities).
β0: Baseline disparities in access or outcomes.
β1: Impact of specific management practices.
X: Management interventions (e.g., cultural competency training, resource reallocation).
ϵ: Error term.
This model allows for the measurement of the direct impact of management practices on equity metrics, providing statistically significant insights into which strategies are most effective. The results are tested for robustness through sensitivity analysis, ensuring their validity.
Qualitative data is analyzed using thematic coding, identifying recurring patterns and insights across interviews and case studies. Themes such as resource availability, organizational culture, and patient trust are triangulated with quantitative findings, offering a holistic view of the factors influencing health equity.
Ethical Considerations
The study adheres to strict ethical standards, ensuring participant confidentiality and informed consent. All participants are briefed on the purpose and scope of the research, and data is anonymized to protect privacy. The study also ensures cultural sensitivity, particularly when engaging with underserved populations, to avoid reinforcing existing inequities.
Reliability and Validity
To enhance reliability, data is collected from multiple sources, ensuring consistency and cross-verification. Validity is addressed through a rigorous sampling process and the use of well-established metrics. Triangulation of quantitative and qualitative findings further strengthens the study’s conclusions.
In conclusion, the methodology is designed to provide a robust and nuanced exploration of the relationship between management practices and health equity. By combining statistical rigor with real-world insights, the study aims to generate findings that are both empirically grounded and practically relevant, contributing to the advancement of equity-focused healthcare management.
Read also: AI-Enhanced Fraud Detection: A Study By Rita Samuel
Chapter 4: Results and Analysis
The findings from this study provide compelling evidence on how management practices influence health equity in healthcare settings. By combining quantitative data with qualitative insights, the results highlight the effectiveness of various strategies in reducing disparities in access and outcomes. This chapter presents the statistical analysis of equity metrics, thematic findings from interviews, and the outcomes of case studies, offering a holistic view of the relationship between management practices and health equity.
Quantitative Findings
The regression model, Y=β0+β1X+ϵ was used to evaluate the impact of specific management interventions (X) on health equity outcomes (Y), such as patient wait times, satisfaction scores, and outcome disparities. The results show that certain management practices significantly improve equity metrics. For example:
- Cultural competency training: This intervention yielded a strong positive effect (β1=0.42, p<0.01), indicating a marked reduction in disparities, particularly among racial and ethnic minority groups.
- Resource reallocation to underserved areas: Demonstrated moderate but significant improvements (β1=0.28, p<0.05) in access metrics, such as reduced wait times for low-income patients.
- Community outreach programs: Correlated positively with increased patient satisfaction scores (β1=0.31, p<0.01), reflecting enhanced trust and engagement with healthcare systems.
However, some interventions, such as standard operational training without equity-specific focus, showed negligible impact (β1=0.07, p=0.15), emphasizing the importance of targeted approaches in addressing disparities.
Qualitative Findings
The thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews reinforced these statistical trends, providing context and depth. Participants highlighted the transformative role of cultural competency and patient-centered care initiatives in fostering trust and improving experiences. One frontline staff member shared, “When we started cultural sensitivity training, I noticed patients felt more understood and comfortable opening up about their health concerns.” Patients echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing the importance of feeling seen and valued in their care journey.
Conversely, interviews revealed challenges in resource allocation, particularly in rural settings, where limited budgets often hinder the implementation of equity-focused strategies. Managers expressed frustration over balancing competing priorities, with one stating, “We know where the gaps are, but the resources to fill them are often lacking.”
Case Study Outcomes
The case studies provided concrete examples of successful equity-focused interventions. For instance, a community health center implementing bilingual services and mobile clinics in underserved neighborhoods saw a 25% reduction in appointment no-show rates within six months. Another hospital that introduced equity-based performance evaluations for staff reported a 15% increase in patient satisfaction scores among minority patients. These examples illustrate how tailored management practices can drive measurable improvements in access and outcomes.
Integrated Analysis
A synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative findings highlights the importance of aligning management practices with specific equity goals. While cultural competency and resource reallocation emerged as key drivers of improvement, the success of these interventions depended heavily on organizational culture and leadership commitment. Teams with strong equity-focused leadership consistently reported better outcomes, underscoring the need for supportive environments that prioritize health equity.
Challenges and Limitations
The findings also revealed barriers to achieving equitable outcomes. Limited funding, staff resistance to change, and the complexity of measuring equity improvements were recurrent themes. These challenges suggest that while effective management practices exist, their implementation requires systemic support and sustained effort.
In conclusion, the results demonstrate that equity-focused management practices can significantly reduce disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. The combination of statistical evidence and real-world insights provides a robust foundation for actionable strategies, which will be further explored in the discussion chapter. These findings underscore the potential of targeted interventions to create more equitable healthcare systems, benefiting both underserved populations and the broader community.
Chapter 5: Discussion
The findings of this study outline the profound role of equity-focused management practices in reducing disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. By integrating quantitative data with qualitative insights, the research highlights the effectiveness of targeted strategies such as cultural competency training, resource reallocation, and community outreach programs. This chapter interprets these results, examines their broader implications, and situates them within the existing body of literature to provide actionable recommendations for healthcare management.
The quantitative analysis revealed that cultural competency training had the strongest positive impact on health equity metrics (β1=0.42, p<0.01). This finding aligns with prior research, such as Betancourt et al. (2016), which demonstrated that culturally informed care improves patient satisfaction and reduces barriers related to language and cultural differences. Qualitative interviews further reinforced this result, with both patients and staff highlighting the importance of empathy and understanding in building trust. A patient from an underserved community remarked, “When my provider spoke in my language and showed understanding of my background, I finally felt comfortable discussing my health concerns.” This underscores that cultural sensitivity is not just a nicety—it is a necessity for equitable care.
Resource reallocation to underserved areas also emerged as a significant intervention (β1=0.28, p<0.05). While its impact was less pronounced than cultural competency training, it proved crucial in addressing systemic barriers such as long wait times and limited-service availability. This finding complements existing studies that emphasize the need for targeted investments in high-need areas (Braveman et al., 2011). However, qualitative data revealed persistent challenges, particularly in rural settings, where limited budgets often lead to tough trade-offs. One manager stated, “We know the need is greatest here, but without additional funding, we’re constantly trying to do more with less.”
Community outreach programs, which had a moderate positive effect (β1=0.31, p<0.01), demonstrated the value of proactive engagement with marginalized populations. Case studies highlighted successful initiatives such as mobile clinics and bilingual services, which reduced no-show rates and improved patient trust. These findings reflect a growing consensus that equity requires meeting patients where they are—both physically and culturally.
Despite these successes, the research also revealed barriers to implementing equity-focused practices. Resistance to change among staff, the complexity of measuring equity improvements, and the challenges of sustaining long-term initiatives were recurrent themes in qualitative interviews. These challenges highlight the importance of fostering an organizational culture that prioritizes health equity. Leaders must actively champion equity goals, provide ongoing training, and allocate resources strategically to ensure sustainable progress.
The results of this study contribute to the broader theoretical discourse on health equity and management. They validate frameworks such as the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) by demonstrating that managerial interventions addressing systemic barriers can have measurable impacts on equity outcomes. Moreover, the findings extend existing knowledge by quantifying the effects of specific management practices, bridging the gap between theoretical models and practical applications.
From a practical perspective, these findings have clear implications for healthcare organizations. Cultural competency training should be a cornerstone of equity initiatives, ensuring that staff are equipped to meet the diverse needs of their patients. Resource reallocation must be guided by data-driven assessments of need, and community outreach efforts should be tailored to the unique challenges of the populations served. Leadership commitment is critical to overcoming resistance and embedding equity as a core organizational value.
In conclusion, this discussion highlights the transformative potential of equity-focused management practices in healthcare. By addressing both systemic barriers and interpersonal dynamics, these strategies can significantly reduce disparities and improve outcomes for underserved populations. However, achieving health equity requires more than isolated interventions—it demands sustained effort, organizational commitment, and a culture of inclusivity. These findings provide a roadmap for healthcare leaders seeking to make equity a reality, offering both the evidence and the tools to drive meaningful change.
Chapter 6: Conclusion and Recommendations
This study has demonstrated the significant role of equity-focused management practices in reducing disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. Through a mixed-methods approach, the research has shown that targeted interventions such as cultural competency training, resource reallocation, and community outreach programs can create meaningful improvements in health equity. By combining quantitative analysis with qualitative insights, the study provides both a robust understanding of the impact of these practices and actionable strategies for healthcare leaders.
The conclusion is clear: effective management practices are essential for addressing health disparities. Cultural competency training emerged as the most impactful intervention (β1=0.42, p<0.01), enabling healthcare providers to build trust and improve communication with diverse patient populations. The qualitative findings reinforced this, with participants highlighting the transformative effect of feeling understood and valued in their care. Similarly, resource reallocation to underserved areas (β1=0.28,p<0.05) and community outreach programs (β1=0.31,p<0.01) demonstrated measurable improvements in access and patient satisfaction, underscoring the importance of strategic investments and proactive engagement with marginalized communities.
However, the study also revealed significant barriers to achieving health equity. Limited funding, resistance to change, and the complexity of measuring equity outcomes were recurring challenges. Addressing these barriers will require sustained commitment from healthcare leaders and organizations. Leadership must play a central role in fostering an organizational culture that prioritizes equity, ensuring that interventions are not only implemented but also supported and sustained over time.
Based on these findings, the following recommendations are proposed for healthcare leaders and organizations seeking to advance health equity:
- Implement Comprehensive Cultural Competency Training Healthcare staff should receive regular training to enhance their ability to understand and address the needs of diverse populations. This training should be embedded in organizational workflows and tied to performance evaluations to ensure accountability.
- Prioritize Resource Reallocation: Resources should be allocated based on data-driven assessments of need, targeting underserved areas where disparities are most pronounced. This includes funding for infrastructure, staffing, and patient services.
- Develop Tailored Community Outreach Programs: Healthcare organizations should engage directly with marginalized populations through initiatives such as mobile clinics, bilingual services, and community partnerships. These programs should be co-designed with community members to ensure they address local needs effectively.
- Foster Leadership Commitment to Equity: Leaders must champion health equity as a core organizational value. This includes integrating equity goals into strategic plans, providing resources for equity-focused initiatives, and creating systems for monitoring and evaluating progress.
- Invest in Data Collection and Analysis: Accurate and disaggregated data is essential for identifying disparities and measuring the impact of interventions. Organizations should invest in robust data systems and analytics capabilities to track equity outcomes and inform decision-making.
From a theoretical perspective, this study contributes to the understanding of how management practices influence health equity by providing quantitative evidence and contextual insights. It bridges the gap between abstract frameworks and practical applications, offering a comprehensive model for assessing and improving equity outcomes.
Future research should build on this foundation by exploring the long-term sustainability of equity-focused interventions and expanding the geographic scope to include diverse healthcare systems. Additionally, integrating emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and predictive analytics, could further enhance the ability to identify and address disparities.
In conclusion, this research supports equity-focused management practices in healthcare. By addressing both systemic barriers and interpersonal dynamics, healthcare leaders can significantly reduce disparities and improve outcomes for underserved populations. However, achieving health equity requires more than isolated interventions—it demands a sustained, organization-wide commitment to fairness and inclusivity. The findings of this study provide a roadmap for driving meaningful change, equipping healthcare organizations with the evidence and strategies needed to make health equity a reality.
References
Alhusamiah, B. K., 2024. Achieving health equity and eliminating health disparities based on nursing philosophical, theoretical, and ethical perspectives. Jordan Journal of Nursing Research.
Avant, N. D., & Gillespie, G., 2019. Pushing for health equity through structural competency and implicit bias education. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning, 11(4), pp. 382-393.
Betancourt, J.R., Green, A.R., Carrillo, J.E. and Ananeh-Firempong, O., 2003. Defining cultural competence: A practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. Public Health Reports, 118(4), pp.293-302.
Braveman, P., Egerter, S. and Williams, D.R., 2011. The social determinants of health: Coming of age. Annual Review of Public Health, 32, pp.381-398.
Dentzer, S., 2022. Advancing equity in US health and healthcare: Health systems’ actions in seven major domains. Management in Healthcare: A Peer-Reviewed Journal.
Hooper, M., & Pérez-Stable, E., 2023. Health equity is not possible without addressing disparities. Health Psychology, 42(9), pp. 625-627.
Khetpal, S., Lopez, J., Redett, R., & Steinbacher, D., 2021. Health equity and healthcare disparities in plastic surgery: What we can do. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery.
Key, K. D., Carrera, J., McMaughan, D., et al., 2023. Advancing equity through centering societal values to operationalize racism as a public health crisis. Health Equity, 7, pp. 477-486.
Macintosh, T., Gracious, B., Brooks, J. R., & Donini, G., 2022. Health equity in medicine. HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine, 3(3), pp. 77-79.
Okolo, C. A., Ijeh, S., Arowoogun, J. O., Adeniyi, A. O., & Omotayo, O., 2024. Healthcare managers’ role in addressing health disparities: A review of strategies. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences.
Royeen, C., 2023. Increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in allied health using ten best practices. Journal of Allied Health, 52(3), pp. e99-e102.
Schwartz, J., 2024. Can we realize a real state of medical equity? Science Insights.
Veinot, T., Ancker, J., & Bakken, S., 2019. Health informatics and health equity: Improving our reach and impact. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.
Woodward, E. N., Singh, R. S., Ndebele-Ngwenya, P., et al., 2020. A more practical guide to incorporating health equity domains in implementation determinant frameworks. Implementation Science Communications, 2.
