BRICS: Africa’s Call For Fair Talks, Not Sacrifice

BRICS: Africa's Call For Fair Talks, Not Sacrifice
BRICS Leaders

In the corridors of global economic power, the emergence of BRICS—comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—stands as a transformative chapter in the narrative of 21st-century geopolitics. Representing a profound shift away from traditional Western dominance, BRICS brings to the table an ambitious agenda of recalibrating the global economic order. Yet, as history unfolds, the continent of Africa finds itself at a decisive juncture, confronting a seminal question: How can Africa, with its extraordinary wealth of natural resources and burgeoning market potential, ensure that it isn’t marginalised or exploited within this new paradigm?

The implications are vast. Given that BRICS nations collectively hold sway over approximately 41% of the world’s population and a staggering $18.6 trillion in combined nominal GDP as of 2019, the alliance offers unparalleled opportunities for economic collaboration. Yet, it also poses perils of perpetuating colonial-era dynamics of resource extraction and inequality. While South Africa’s inclusion in BRICS ostensibly brings Africa into this circle of influence, the reality is that the continent’s diverse interests and vulnerabilities cannot be adequately represented by a single nation.

As the BRICS alliance builds momentum, Africa must seize the initiative to shift from a passive role to that of an assertive stakeholder. A passive approach would render Africa the sacrificial lamb in a global economic framework that already disproportionately favours developed nations. In contrast, an assertive posture, built upon rigourous, transparent negotiations, positions Africa to reap equitable benefits from this new world order.

The stakes are too high for Africa to be a mere spectator in its destiny. Rather than being subordinated as a repository for raw materials or as a pawn in geopolitical maneuverings, Africa must assert its voice, table its demands, and architect its future within the BRICS alliance. Anything less would be a forfeiture of its rightful place on the global economic stage.

As we unravel the intricacies of Africa’s interactions with BRICS in this article, the imperative becomes clear: Africa must not be the sacrificial lamb but an empowered partner in the unfolding tapestry of global economic relations.

Unraveling the Asymmetry and Opportunity in BRICS-Africa Trade Relations

Unpacking trade metrics, an intriguing narrative unfolds. Africa-BRICS trade catapulted from a modest $67 billion in 2001 to an astounding $385 billion in 2019, based on World Bank data. By 2022, total trade is estimated at $414 billion, with China alone accounting for a lion’s share at $248 billion or 59% of the trade volume. Following China, India comes in at $64 billion (15%), Russia at $27 billion (7%), Brazil at $22 billion (5%), and South Africa at $13 billion (3%).

Read Also: Africa’s Role: Weighing Putin’s Deal And Ukraine Peace

The asymmetry, however, lies in the trade imbalance. While the trade deficit has contracted from $100 billion in 2019 to an estimated $60 billion in 2022, the economic disparity is far from resolved. A key contributor to this deficit is Africa’s dependency on commodity exports, subjecting the continent to the whims of global market volatility.

But the narrative isn’t one-dimensional. Africa is witnessing a surge in competitiveness across manufacturing sectors, partly fueling the narrowing of the trade deficit. Concurrently, BRICS nations have ramped up investment activities in Africa, further boosting economic indices and employment metrics.

Tectonic Shifts and Strategic Pathways

The relationship is fraught with challenges but is interspersed with equally compelling opportunities. The perennial issue of trade deficit and commodity dependence persists, exacerbated by infrastructural bottlenecks and capacity-building requirements in Africa. Yet, the silver lining emerges in the form of expanding BRICS markets, increasing Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), technology transfer opportunities, and synergistic South-South cooperation on sustainability and climate change initiatives.

The landscape is as complex as it is fraught with potential. It encapsulates not just the tactical aspects of international trade, but also the long-term strategic visions that Africa must articulate and actionise. This goes beyond mere trade numbers; it’s a defining litmus test for how Africa positions itself in the evolving geopolitical jigsaw.

As the tectonic plates of global power continue to shift, the crucial task ahead for Africa is not just to be a participant but to be a strategist and equitable partner in this convoluted yet promising dance of economic diplomacy. The opportunities are not just incremental but transformative—if navigated judiciously. Therefore, the quintessential takeaway transcends the statistics: Africa must not merely adapt to the BRICS paradigm but shape it, turning historical asymmetries into avenues for sustainable, mutual growth.

The Resource Curse

Amidst the kaleidoscope of global geopolitics and economic alliances, Africa’s relationship with the BRICS nations, especially within the grand design of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), stands as an intriguing case study in contrasts. On one hand, the initiative promises unprecedented levels of infrastructure investment, potentially reshaping the developmental narrative for a continent rife with challenges. On the other hand, this relationship bears the indelible marks of asymmetry, and has been critically assessed as an extension of neo-colonial influence under the veneer of cooperative diplomacy.

By 2023, China’s projected investment within the BRI framework balloons to an astronomical $150 billion across 1,400 projects in 65 countries. Africa stands to be a principal beneficiary—or possibly, a principal debtor, given the $60 billion sunk into the continent as of 2018. Ostensibly, these are staggering sums directed toward catalysing Africa’s much-needed infrastructural and economic renaissance. Yet, the question that looms ominously is whether this engagement is less a partnership and more a lopsided arrangement—one that, for all its glittering promises, risks ensnaring Africa in a web of unsustainable debt, political subservience, and worst of all, an enduring ‘resource curse.’

Although statistics chart a burgeoning economic relationship with projected total trade valued at $414 billion in 2022, the unspoken narrative is one of glaring trade deficits and imbalance. For instance, Africa’s trade shortfall with China alone stands at an approximate $20 billion, a red flag signaling a larger systemic issue. Such numerical imbalances are not just ledger entries but markers of a deeply entrenched power asymmetry. They exemplify Africa’s quandary: a paradoxical state where abundant natural resources become the fulcrum not for collective elevation, but for exploitation and external control.

The BRI’s ambitious infrastructure projects—spanning ports, roads, and railways—do indeed offer a glimmer of transformative potential. However, these infrastructural labyrinths often function as conduits primarily for resource extraction, thereby perpetuating the same vicious cycle of economic inequality. As it currently stands, the developmental rhetoric might be rich, but the reality could be strikingly poor for Africa.

Furthermore, this isn’t merely a fiscal issue but a fundamental challenge to the ethical core of international partnerships. The ‘resource curse’ is a litmus test for the global community’s commitment to equitable engagement, not just in terms of economics but in the shaping of a more collaborative, democratic world order. As Africa contemplates its strategic alignments with global titans like the BRICS, the stakes could not be higher. The continent must actively shape, not merely participate in, these grand global narratives and ensure that its engagement is predicated upon a vision of long-term, sustainable, and equitable growth. Anything short of this would merely perpetuate a legacy of exploitation artfully cloaked in the language of opportunity.

Africa’s Vulnerability

Within the ever-evolving geopolitical landscape, Africa’s engagement with the BRICS consortium—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—offers a panorama replete with both potential and pitfalls. At the heart of this intricate relationship lies a fundamental asymmetry, born not merely from economic imbalances but from a divergence in strategic capabilities. While South Africa stands as Africa’s flag-bearer within BRICS, the nation is hardly a microcosm of the continent’s myriad complexities, aspirations, and challenges. Representing a continent of 54 diverse nations through the lens of a single country, however sophisticated or advanced, poses a significant limitation in itself.

This structural asymmetry becomes glaringly visible in sectors like technology and manufacturing, where BRICS nations wield considerable clout, far outpacing the majority of African states. Although the African Union’s Agenda 2063 outlines an aspirational roadmap for an ‘integrated, prosperous, and peaceful Africa’, driven by its own citizens, this vision runs the risk of becoming an unfulfilled promise if the continent doesn’t strategically negotiate its role within global partnerships like BRICS. The disparity is not merely about numbers; it is an inequality of bargaining power, one that could manifest in policy directives and trade agreements tailored primarily to serve the interests of more powerful member nations at the expense of Africa’s broader developmental objectives.

Herein lies the crux of Africa’s vulnerability—its underrepresentation in frameworks that have a significant bearing on its future. If unchecked, this imbalance could not only hamper the achievement of sustainable growth but could exacerbate existing socio-economic disparities within the continent. BRICS, for all its anti-Western sentiment and purported focus on South-South cooperation, could inadvertently become an arena where Africa’s goals are subordinated to the strategic imperatives of more dominant players. It’s a subtext that threatens to reduce Africa’s role to that of a passive beneficiary rather than an active stakeholder in crafting a new economic and geopolitical order.

The challenge for Africa is not merely to carve out a seat at the table, but to redefine the rules of the game. Africa must push for a democratisation of international economic relations, to ensure that its engagement with global powers is rooted in principles of mutual respect, equitable growth, and shared prosperity. Agenda 2063 shouldn’t just be a paper manifesto but a negotiating tool that Africa employs to set the terms of its international partnerships. Otherwise, the continent’s relationships with blocs like BRICS run the risk of becoming the newest chapter in a long history of unequal exchanges.

The Call for Equitable Negotiation

In the crucible of global economic partnerships, Africa has often been relegated to a peripheral role, primarily serving as a reservoir of raw materials and commodities. This extractive model of engagement perpetuates a long-standing narrative of inequality that has characterized Africa’s international relationships for centuries. However, as winds of change sweep across the continent—most notably through the enactment of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA)—there emerges a compelling opportunity to rewrite this narrative. AfCFTA, envisioned as the world’s largest free-trade zone, presents an unparalleled platform for Africa to assert itself as an equal partner in the arenas of trade, commerce, and global governance.

By leveraging the collective bargaining power of a unified market that comprises 54 nations and over 1.3 billion people, Africa can initiate a paradigm shift in how it engages with global partners, including BRICS nations. Collective bargaining offers Africa the scale and negotiation leverage that individual nations often lack when dealing with economically robust partners. In this context, AfCFTA becomes not merely a trade agreement but a geopolitical strategy, a manifesto articulating Africa’s terms of engagement with the world.

This empowerment through collective action must manifest in several key areas for negotiation to drive a more equitable global partnership. First and foremost, contractual transparency should be non-negotiable. The veil of opacity that often shrouds contracts related to resource extraction or infrastructure projects has been a breeding ground for exploitation and corruption. Transparent agreements provide not only legal protection but also social accountability, ensuring that projects are aligned with community needs and national development goals.

Secondly, the issue of responsible lending practices must be vigorously pursued. For far too long, Africa has been caught in a web of debt, often due to unfavourable loan terms that prioritise lender gains over sustainable development. As Africa negotiates new partnerships or restructures existing ones, the stipulations for borrowing must be anchored in principles of sustainability and economic viability to avoid the pitfalls of ‘debt-trap diplomacy’.

Trade tariffs and economic barriers deserve significant attention. AfCFTA itself aims to dismantle the internal tariff barriers that have long stifled intra-Africa trade. As Africa becomes more integrated as a single market, it can negotiate more advantageous terms with global partners. The focus must shift from mere access to markets toward more favourable trading terms that can catalyse domestic industries, thereby elevating Africa from a supplier of raw materials to a manufacturer of value-added goods.

In essence, Africa stands on the cusp of a transformative moment. Its traditional role as a passive player in global economics can and must evolve, replacing outdated models of engagement with new paradigms that emphasise mutual growth and equitable partnerships. The AfCFTA is more than just a trade agreement; it’s a vision statement for Africa’s future—a future where the continent is not merely integrated into the global economy but significantly influences its shape and direction. As negotiations unfold, Africa must wield its newfound collective power strategically, ensuring that transparency, responsible lending, and favourable trade tariffs are not just on the table, but are integral to any agreement. This is not merely a matter of economic necessity but a clarion call for justice, equality, and shared global prosperity.

Conclusion: Africa’s Imperative for Equitable Partnerships in a Multi-Polar World

As Africa undergoes a momentous phase of socio-economic metamorphosis, its engagements with global power blocs like BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) will be instrumental in shaping its destiny. These relationships are not mere footnotes in the annals of global economics; they are the crucible in which Africa’s future will be forged. Yet, this engagement must not be a Faustian bargain that trades short-term gains for long-term vulnerabilities. Africa has to be more than just a fertile playground for external economies or a sacrificial offering on the altar of global capitalism. It must assert itself as a sovereign, dignified stakeholder in a multipolar world, capable of shaping not just its future but also contributing meaningfully to the global economic landscape.

For Africa, the aphorism ‘If you want to go fast, go alone; if you want to go far, go together’ has never been more pertinent. Collective strength, epitomised by groundbreaking initiatives like the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), should be the cornerstone of Africa’s negotiation strategy with BRICS or any other economic alliance. In essence, the AfCFTA is not just a trade agreement, but a proclamation of Africa’s desire to forge partnerships based on equitable trade, sustainable investment, and mutual respect.

Rather than being content with a peripheral role, Africa must demand centre stage. This involves recognising and exploiting its leverage as a vast market and a reservoir of untapped potential. However, it’s crucial for Africa to understand that these partnerships are not altruistic; they are driven by the self-interests of each nation involved. This is precisely why Africa needs to articulate its own interests clearly, strategically, and unapologetically. By doing so, it elevates itself from a position of vulnerability to one of partnership.

In navigating the intricate geopolitics of modern-day economic alliances, Africa’s approach must be calculated and precise. The continent must seek partnerships that prioritise not just economic outputs but also the welfare of its people, the development of its institutional capacities, and the sanctity of its natural resources. Anything less would be tantamount to a dereliction of the very principles that ought to guide international collaborations—mutual benefit, sustainability, and respect for sovereignty.

The stakes are high—far too high to leave Africa’s role in these partnerships to chance or to the paternalistic whims of historical powers. Africa’s relationships with organisations like BRICS should be a judicious blend of pragmatism and aspiration, meticulously planned but audaciously ambitious. The potential rewards—sustainable development, technological transfer, job creation, and a more equitable share of global prosperity—are monumental.

In this complex tableau of global alliances, Africa must carve out its niche as a formidable player, not as a bystander or, worse, a pawn. The narrative of Africa as a dependent entity must be shattered. In its place, a new story must be told, one of a robust, self-sufficient Africa that enriches the world not just with its resources but with its wisdom, its vision, and its indomitable spirit. It’s time for Africa to choose the more challenging path, to go far, but to go far collectively, inclusively, and most importantly—equitably.

Africa Digital News, New York