Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, stands at the crossroads of its identity crisis. Rich in both human and natural resources, Nigeria’s history, culture, and economy offer a wide array of possibilities, yet the country continues to struggle under the weight of its colonial past and internal contradictions. The very name “Nigeria,” given by Flora Shaw, a British journalist and the mistress of Lord Frederick Lugard, epitomizes the colonial imprint that still defines the nation-state. As Nigeria strives for a better future, it is imperative to ask whether the country should continue to bear a name bestowed by foreign imperialists or seek a new identity that reflects the aspirations of its people.
A Colonial Gift: The Origin of “Nigeria”
The name “Nigeria” is rooted in colonial domination. In the late 19th century, Flora Shaw, writing for The Times, coined the term “Nigeria” as a means to describe the vast area surrounding the Niger River. This designation ignored the distinct ethnic, cultural, and linguistic diversity of the people who inhabited the region. Nigeria was named not as a reflection of its people’s identity but as a convenience for colonial administration.
The amalgamation of Northern and Southern Nigeria in 1914, under the British colonial regime led by Lord Lugard, further entrenched the artificial nature of the country. Nigeria, like many African countries, was structured not with the well-being of its citizens in mind but as a geopolitical tool for resource extraction and administrative control. The name symbolizes this legacy of division and exploitation, serving as a constant reminder of the arbitrary lines drawn by foreign powers.
A Country Rich in Resources, Yet Struggling
Since gaining independence in 1960, Nigeria has remained one of Africa’s wealthiest countries in terms of natural resources, particularly oil. It ranks among the top ten oil-producing countries in the world. Nigeria is also blessed with vast agricultural lands, mineral resources, and a population exceeding 200 million, many of whom are young, energetic, and educated. Despite these riches, Nigeria continues to grapple with entrenched poverty, inequality, and corruption.
As of 2023, the most recent data shows that approximately 37.5% of Nigerians still live below the international poverty line. While this marks a slight improvement from the 40% recorded in 2020, it clearly explains the persistent challenge facing a nation-state endowed with vast natural resources.
Moreover, Nigeria’s Gini coefficient, a measure of income inequality, remains worryingly high at 35.1 in 2023. This figure highlights the apparent divide between the country’s wealthy elite and the millions of citizens struggling to secure basic needs like food, healthcare, and education. Despite the nation’s immense potential, a significant portion of its population remains trapped in poverty, while a privileged few continue to accumulate enormous wealth.
These challenges are not merely the result of poor governance but also reflect the legacy of colonial exploitation, symbolized by the name “Nigeria.” The country was not designed to serve its people; it was engineered to benefit foreign interests. This structural flaw has persisted into the post-colonial era, with Nigeria’s leadership often complicit in perpetuating systems of corruption and inequality.
Corruption and Insecurity: A Colonial Hangover
Corruption remains one of Nigeria’s most significant challenges. According to Transparency International’s 2023 Corruption Perception Index, Nigeria ranked 154 out of 180 countries, highlighting the pervasive nature of graft and public sector inefficiency. Corruption drains public resources, diverts funds meant for infrastructure, healthcare, and education, and undermines the rule of law. The remnants of colonial bureaucracy, designed to serve foreign masters rather than local needs, have allowed a culture of impunity to flourish.
Insecurity is another issue that has plagued Nigeria since independence. The rise of Boko Haram in the northeastern region of the country is emblematic of deeper structural problems, including poverty, unemployment, and political marginalization. Since 2009, the Boko Haram insurgency has claimed thousands of lives and displaced millions. Ethnic and religious tensions, often exacerbated by colonial divisions, continue to fuel violence across various regions of Nigeria. From herdsmen-farmer clashes in the Middle Belt to the kidnappings in the South, Nigeria’s security challenges reflect its colonial roots.
The Name Nigeria: A Call for Reassessment
The argument for reconsidering Nigeria’s name is not merely symbolic but reflects a deeper need to rethink the country’s identity and direction. Why should a country so rich in history and culture continue to carry a name that does not reflect its indigenous heritage? Over 250 ethnic groups inhabit Nigeria, with the three largest being the Hausa-Fulani, Yoruba, and Igbo, each with rich traditions that predate colonialism by centuries. Yet, the name “Nigeria” erases this diversity, reducing a rich and complex civilization to a colonial abstraction.
Nigeria’s young and dynamic population offers a unique opportunity for rebirth. The country’s youth, who account for more than 60% of the population, are driving innovation in tech, arts, and entrepreneurship. By 2050, Nigeria is projected to be the third most populous country in the world. These young Nigerians deserve a country—and a name—that reflects their ambitions and potential, rather than a legacy of foreign domination.
Read also: Kanu’s Detention: A Test Of Nigeria’s Democratic Integrity
A Path Forward: Reclaiming National Identity
Changing Nigeria’s name would not be an instant solution to the myriad challenges the country faces, but it would be a significant step towards redefining its identity. The name is a powerful symbol. Just as African nations like Ghana and Zimbabwe shed their colonial names (the Gold Coast and Rhodesia, respectively) as part of their independence struggles, Nigeria could benefit from a similar rebranding.
Nigeria’s challenges are formidable, from poverty and inequality to corruption and insecurity. However, these challenges are not insurmountable. The nation has the resources, both natural and human, to thrive. What it needs is a leadership committed to addressing the root causes of these issues and a national identity that reflects its people’s true heritage, not the legacy of colonizers.
Condemning British Influence: A Legacy of Exploitation
British colonial influence in Nigeria has left deep and enduring scars that continue to affect the country today. When the British first established control over Nigeria in the late 19th century, their primary interest was not in developing the country or improving the lives of its people. Rather, it was to extract resources for their own economic gain, with little regard for the consequences that would follow. The forced amalgamation of Northern and Southern Nigeria in 1914, driven by British administrative convenience, created deep-seated divisions that have plagued the country for over a century. These divisions, exacerbated by colonial policies of “divide and rule,” continue to fuel ethnic and religious tensions today.
Exploitation of Natural Resources
One of the most egregious aspects of British colonialism in Nigeria was the exploitation of the country’s abundant natural resources. The British were primarily interested in Nigeria’s agricultural wealth, especially cash crops like palm oil, cocoa, and groundnuts. These commodities were harvested and exported to Britain, while the local economy was left impoverished. Later, when oil was discovered in the Niger Delta, it became the crown jewel of British economic interest. By the time Nigeria gained independence in 1960, the country had become highly dependent on oil, and the colonial legacy of resource extraction had laid the foundation for widespread corruption in the post-colonial era.
Today, oil accounts for approximately 90% of Nigeria’s export earnings and 70% of government revenue. Yet, despite this wealth, Nigeria ranks among the poorest countries in the world, with millions of its citizens living below the poverty line. This stark contrast between resource wealth and widespread poverty is a direct result of the exploitative colonial policies that prioritized British profits over the well-being of the Nigerian people.
Colonial Education System: An Engine of Division
The British also imposed an education system that was designed to serve their interests, rather than fostering genuine development. Colonial education in Nigeria was heavily skewed towards producing a small, Western-educated elite that could act as intermediaries between the colonial government and the local population. While this education created a class of Nigerians who were literate in English, it did little to address the needs of most of the population. Furthermore, the British prioritized missionary schools in the South while neglecting education in the North, creating an imbalance that has had lasting consequences.
As a result, the North-South educational divide persists to this day. According to the 2021 UNESCO data, literacy rates in Northern Nigeria are significantly lower than in the South, with some states like Yobe having literacy rates as low as 7.23%. This educational disparity has contributed to the underdevelopment of the North and has fueled extremist movements like Boko Haram, which target young, disenfranchised populations with little formal education. The roots of this imbalance lie in British colonial policies that deliberately neglected Northern Nigeria to maintain control through indirect rule.
Corruption and the British Legacy of Governance
The colonial system of governance imposed by the British relied heavily on corrupt practices. The British administration frequently turned a blind eye to abuses of power by local rulers, so long as those rulers helped maintain British control. This legacy of corruption has persisted in Nigeria, where political elites continue to enrich themselves at the expense of the people. According to the World Bank, an estimated $400 billion has been lost to corruption in Nigeria since independence, a figure that is staggering in its implications.
The British system of indirect rule, which relied on empowering local chiefs and emirs to act as proxies for the colonial administration, laid the groundwork for Nigeria’s current struggles with corruption. These leaders were incentivized to collect taxes and maintain order, often through coercive means, without any real accountability to the local population. This system allowed British officials to maintain control with minimal resources while enriching themselves through the extraction of wealth. Unfortunately, this lack of accountability has persisted in Nigeria’s post-colonial political landscape, where government officials often act with impunity.
Divide and Rule: A Policy of Ethnic Fragmentation
One of the most damaging legacies of British colonial rule in Nigeria is the policy of “divide and rule,” which exacerbated ethnic divisions and pitted groups against one another. The British intentionally fostered competition and distrust among Nigeria’s various ethnic groups, a tactic that allowed them to maintain control but also planted the seeds of future conflict. By privileging certain ethnic groups—such as the Hausa-Fulani in the North and the Yoruba in the Southwest—over others, the British ensured that the country would be politically fractured long after their departure.
This ethnic fragmentation has had devastating consequences for Nigeria. Post-independence politics has been marked by ethnic favoritism and regionalism, leading to coups, civil wars, and ongoing conflicts. The Nigerian Civil War (1967-1970), which claimed over a million lives, can be traced back to the British colonial practice of fostering ethnic divisions. Even today, political power in Nigeria is often contested along ethnic lines, with leaders using their positions to favor their own groups at the expense of national unity.
Conclusion: Time for Nigeria to Reclaim Its Identity
The British colonial legacy in Nigeria has been one of exploitation, division, and neglect. From the forced amalgamation of ethnic groups to the extraction of resources and the fostering of ethnic tensions, British influence has left a deep and enduring scar on the nation. The very name “Nigeria,” given by a British colonial mistress with no connection to the people or their history, is a reminder of this legacy of exploitation.
As Nigeria moves forward, it must grapple with this colonial past and seek to redefine itself in a way that reflects the true identity of its people. This means not only reconsidering the name “Nigeria” but also addressing the structural inequalities, corruption, and ethnic divisions that have their roots in British colonial policies. Only by acknowledging and confronting this past can Nigeria chart a path towards a more just and prosperous future. It is time for Nigeria to reclaim its destiny, free from the shadow of British influence.
