Practically everyone that holds any political power in Nigeria as the President, Governor, Local Government Chairman, Legislator, Minister, State Commissioner, Councillor, board member of any parastatal or government-owned organisation, or political party official, is in a conspiracy against citizens of Nigeria.
Elite consensus in Nigeria is actually an elite conspiracy against the interest of the poor masses. It’s the most cunning scheme to convert the commonwealth of the country to the advantage of a few.
The elites have also weaponised poverty against the people. Many people will recall that during the 2021 COVID-19 lockdown, the Nigerian political elite, not only locked up stacks of palliative but the more insensitive of them began to use the palliatives as souvenirs at birthday parties, events, etc. All this was done while many Nigerians were always going to bed hungry.
These bunch of heartless fellows have realised that by keeping the masses poor through inept and intentionally wicked policies that lead to perennial shortage and scarcity of every commodity and service, they can continue to control the masses.
As the piper dictates the tune, the oppressor who can give a measly financial inducement can get a poverty-stricken voter to cast his vote against his own interest–for immediate gratification. Some poor Nigerians sell their permanent voter cards, even if they will only temporarily meet their needs.
A fortnight ago, a federal cabinet member accused State Governors in Nigeria of primarily being responsible for the excruciating poverty in the country, and their push-back highlight the woeful incompetence of Nigeria’s leaders. The Minister of State for Budget and National Planning, Clement Agba had rebuked the governors for neglecting the rural areas and thereby entrenching poverty. With a new report by the National Bureau of Statistics aggregating the number of poor Nigerians at 133 million, there is enough blame to go round – the Federal Government’s incompetence induces poverty, and the State Governments entrench it.
Critics, particularly the Governors, have indignantly accused Agba of shifting the blame for the prevailing hardship in Nigeria from the central to the sub-national governments, but a deep reflection on the minister’s submission lends credence to the Governors ’ role in entrenching mass poverty. Both tiers of government have failed woefully in quality service delivery, but the Governors ’ deficiency is excruciating given their superintendence over the country’s entire land area outside of the Federal Capital Territory.
In 2018, the World Poverty Clock listed Nigeria as the country with the highest number of the world’s extremely poor people with 86.9 million persons, overtaking India. The Minister pointed out that Governors misplace priorities by opting for white elephants like fanciful overhead bridges at State capitals instead of developing the rural communities.
This resonates. Rural infrastructure, declares the Asian Development Bank, results in economic growth, sustainable and socially inclusive development, and poverty reduction. But denied basic amenities, jobs and entrepreneurial opportunities, the percentage of Nigeria’s population living in rural areas has been declining steadily. From over 70 percent in the 1970s, the rural population fell to 56.25 percent in 2010, according to Trading Economics, and 47.25 percent in 2021.
There are very few motorable roads in rural areas where agriculture, the largest contributor to GDP, is the main occupation. The NBS says agriculture contributed 25.9 percent to GDP in 2021 compared to trade (15.7 percent); ICT (15.5 percent) and manufacturing (9.0 percent). By law, the land is under the control of governors, giving them considerable leeway to attract and direct investments in agriculture, mining, manufacturing, and job creation. But they prefer to construct edifices in cities while the State generally groans under maladministration.
The multidimensional poverty study found that 72 percent of the poor Nigerians live in rural areas. Since the 36 States control these communities except the FCT, the governors should face the biting reality that they have failed.
Besides, the Minister’s exposition that Governors prefer to build airports in their State capitals rather than basic amenities in the hinterland is painfully visible. Many states have completed or are in the process of completing airports, which remain mostly idle as the economic activities that promote travel are largely absent.
An airport is worthless where the majority are poor and lack basic facilities. They need decent roads to move goods to the urban centres. Nigeria’s food crisis is partly traced to its dilapidated roads; with producers unable to convey agricultural produce to the markets, goods perish before reaching the consumers. ActionAid estimates that Nigeria suffers post-harvest losses of N3.5 trillion annually due to impassable roads and the absence of storage facilities. Another NGO, Ecosystem-based Adaptation for Food Security Assembly, said Nigeria suffered 75 per cent post-harvest losses.
The Governors must have to address this; stop their wasteful habits, such as expensive vehicle convoys, aircraft, and hiring battalions of aides. They should rather accord utmost priority to social services, rural development, and investment stimulation.
They should aspire to be self-sustaining economic units like sub-national territories in other federations; save for Lagos and lately Kaduna, they lack economic plans with key macroeconomic growth targets. Apart from Lagos, the States can hardly survive without federal allocations.
Worse, they misuse statutory allocations and corruption thrives. The Federal Government in the past seven years disbursed N1.98 trillion to the oil-producing states as part of the backlog of the 13 percent oil derivation. But typically, Bayelsa, a major beneficiary and least populous, was rated the State with the second highest incidence of poverty after Sokoto in the multidimensional poverty report. Also, they emasculate the local governments and seize their 20.60 percent of federally allocated revenue, thereby depriving the grassroots of basic amenities.
In other federations, federating units have comprehensive economic plans with GDP growth, job creation, and investment and infrastructure targets, leveraging their areas of strength. If the state of California, United States, were a country, it would have been the world’s fourth largest economy in 2021 with its GDP of $3.37 trillion, behind Japan. It achieved this by concentrating on agriculture, ICT, and the renewable energy industry.
It is high time political officeholders in Nigeria began to critically review their errant ways.